|
What's this
about?
Were you looking for me?
Probably not. Most likely you were searching for certain content
and, having found it on this site, you wanted to know a bit more about what's behind it.
This non-commercial
(and, obviously, technologically unevolved) website is a repository of
(a) samples of the scholarship that has put me in the debt of
others over many years and (b) essays of mine through which I try to pay that debt forward.
I hope the site continues to play that role, although I expect
that it will do so less frequently than it has over the past
eight years.
Those who have visited since January 17, 2004 should know that I have returned to the Christian orthodoxy from which
(this may come as a surprise to some of you) my thinking strayed.
Those fields did not yield what they seemed to promise. The harvest
of my intellectual discontent is still on display here, but
henceforth new content will reflect my new-old interests.
My current priority is situate myself mentally within Christian
orthodoxy, a matter that I do not think has been settled for me.
I believe myself to be a member in good standing of the Roman
Catholic communion within the Catholic Church, from whose fold I
do not exclude Eastern Orthodox and Reformed Christians. Such
self-situating requires more prayer and reflection than
advertising.
Despite their disunity on the doctrinal level, these diverse
communions form one Church of Jesus Christ. No official
statement of any particular communion has gotten things exactly
right, but neither does this deficiency justify a Christian's
failure to belong to any one of them. Continued disunity is the
greater scandal (John 17).
I am painfully aware that Roman Catholic officialdom does not
regard the Roman Catholic Church as merely one
“communion”
among others. Whether my more modest description disqualifies me
from continued membership is a question I am in no hurry to
test, but I am certain that such a test's worst consequence
would not include loss of membership in the communio
sanctorum. So let the chips fall where they may.
In any case, my interest in airing the questions that interest
me now is much less than it has been. Simply put, such airing
has not paid off. I have no desire to issue a public retraction,
and you probably have even less to read one. After I've drawn so
much attention to thought I now deem error, it would be unseemly
for me to put forward what I now deem true with the same
enthusiasm. For now, at least, much less is much more. The
only continuity I see between then and now is personal
idiosyncrasy, which is an admission that I cannot escape my
times.
God only knows what that means for the future of this hopelessly
old-fashioned site, but I assure those who have ever gotten
anything out of their visit that there are no plans to pull it
down. I do have a few blogs*, but to maintain them on
anything like a regular basis will cost more in the coin of
precious time and energy, better spent on study, than I am
willing to pay. If they have created expectations that will most
likely not be met, I accept whatever censure my failure exacts.
There are weightier matters to consider.
As always, feel free to write me at anarchristian at juno dot
com.
Anthony Flood
January 17, 2012
(The site's eighth anniversary)
* Namely,
anarcho-Catholic,
anarchristian,
and
Tony Flood's
House of Hard Bop |
Quotations
that survive the transition
Conversation
Conversation is a game with some hard rules: say only what you
mean; say it as accurately as you can; listen to and respect
what the other says, however different or other; be willing to
correct or defend your opinions if challenged by the
conversation partner; be willing to argue if necessary, to
confront if demanded, to endure necessary conflict, to change
your mind if the evidence suggests it.
David Tracy, Plurality and Ambiguity:
Hermeneutics, Religion, Hope. Harper & Row, 1987, p.
19.
The Desire to Be
Deceived
A prime cause of our being deceived is . . . always our own desire to
be so deceived. . . . (A)ll of us constantly need to be asking
ourselves what it is which we want to be true, and whether our
desires so to believe are stronger than our desires to know the
truth, however uncongenial to us that truth may be. It is
truly an existential challenge.
Antony Flew, How to Think Straight:
An Introduction to Critical Reasoning.
(Thanks to Dave Lull for the citation I carelessly lost!)
|